Skip to content

We represented Mr. Vishnu Gupta in a Bail Matter who was alleged to be Director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies” | 8000|

Case Brief

Case Title : Vishnu Gupta vs State of U.P. 

Case No. : 8000/2023 (BAIL)

Decided On / Result : 10.08.2023 

Quorum : Hon’ble Subhash Vidyarthi, J.

Brief Facts of the Case – 

                In this Matter FIR lodged on 25/09/2020 at Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow in which the company was investing the amounts by a lot of persons by giving bond papers with the greediness of 20% to 40% return. After November 2019, the company stopped giving the amount to the investors. Some amounts list which was invested is given below:

Anand Upadhyaya – 2,50,000 Rs.

Neetu Tripathi – 50,000 Rs.

Ashok Kumar Yadav – 2,00,000 Rs.

Sushil Sharma – 62,500 Rs.

But now,  the company is refusing to give the amount to the persons by which the investors are facing a lot of problems.

Fews facts that went against our client – 

                Some facts were very unfavourable to our client Like –

  1. This matter was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (E.D.) & Economic offences Wing (E.O.W.)

  2. Media & People were claiming that in this matter a Scam of about 1000 Cr. has been done by the said Company.

  3. Applicant was having the Criminal History of 54 Cases.

  4. Applicant was the real brother of Director Ajeet Kumar Gupta who was the director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies”

  5. Gangster Act was also imposed on the applicant.

              

Applicant was Challenged Under Sections – 

  1. 409 IPC –  Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant / Punishable upto 10 years of Imprisonment / Non – Bailable

  2. 420 IPC  – Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years of Imprisonment / Non – Bailable

Our Submissions and Court’s finding in favour of our client / Conclusion  – 

We gave our best while arguing for our client. Later on Hon’ble court considered the facts that even though the matter is serious, the applicant discloses his involvement in 50 cases of similar nature, in 40 of which the applicant has already been granted bail. Therefore, Hon’ble Court granted bail to the applicant.