Skip to content

We represented Mr. Vishnu Gupta in a Bail Matter who was alleged to be Director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies” |9830|

Case Brief

Case Title : Vishnu Gupta vs State of U.P. 

Case No. : 9830/2023 (BAIL)

Decided On / Result : 04.08.2023 

Quorum : Hon’ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

Brief Facts of the Case – 

                In this Matter, FIR No. 563 lodged on 22/08/2020 at Police Station Pura Kalander, District Ayodhya against 6 persons in which the company took the amounts of money by 40% allurement of lucrative return to gain the trust of the victim by forgery. The company submitted the bond papers and refused to give the amount to the investors.

Fews facts that went against our client – 

                Some facts were very unfavourable to our client Like –

  1. This matter was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (E.D.) & Economic offences Wing (E.O.W.)

  2. Media & People were claiming that in this matter a Scam of about 1000 Cr. has been done by the said Company.

  3. Applicant was having the Criminal History of 54 Cases.

  4. Applicant was the real brother of Director Ajeet Kumar Gupta who was the director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies”

  5. Gangster Act was also imposed on the applicant.

              

Applicant was Challenged Under Sections – 

  1. 419 IPC – Cheating by personation / Punishable upto 3 years of Imprisonment, fine or both / Bailable

  2. 420 IPC  – Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years of Imprisonment / Non – Bailable 

  3. 506 IPC  – Criminal Intimidation / Imprisonment for 2 years, fine, or both / Non Bailable 

  4. 467 IPC  – Forgery / Punishable upto 10 years or life Imprisonment / Non – Bailable

  5. 468 IPC  – Forgery for the purpose of Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years and fine /  Non Bailable

  6. 406 IPC  – Pertaining to criminal breach / Punishable upto 3 years of Imprisonment, fine or both / Non – Bailable

Our Submissions and Court’s finding in favour of our client / Conclusion  – 

We gave our best while arguing for our client. Later on Hon’ble court considered the aforesaid facts but there is no specific allegation in the F.I.R against the applicant and that the applicant has already been granted bail in 37 other cases of similar nature. Therefore, the Hon’ble Court granted bail to the applicant.