Skip to content

We represented Mr. Vishnu Gupta in a Bail Matter who was alleged to be Director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies” |9182|

Case Brief

Case Title : Vishnu Gupta vs State of U.P. 

Case No. : 9182/2023 (BAIL)

Decided On / Result : 21.07.2023 

Quorum : Hon’ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

Brief Facts of the Case – 

                In this Matter, FIR No. 177 lodged on 09/04/2021 at Police Station Cantt., District Ayodhya against 6 persons in which the company took the amounts of money by Forgery such as by showing the fake FD’s of 10 crore Rupees of nationalized Banks to gain the trust of the victim. So, the victim submitted the amounts to the company.

Fews facts that went against our client – 

                Some facts were very unfavourable to our client Like –

  1. This matter was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (E.D.) & Economic offences Wing (E.O.W.)

  2. Media & People were claiming that in this matter a Scam of about 1000 Cr. has been done by the said Company.

  3. Applicant was having the Criminal History of 54 Cases.

  4. Applicant was the real brother of Director Ajeet Kumar Gupta who was the director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies”

  5. Gangster Act was also imposed on the applicant.

              

Applicant was Challenged Under Sections – 

  1. 419 IPC – Cheating by personation / Punishable upto 3 years of Imprisonment, fine or both / Bailable

  2. 420 IPC  – Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years of Imprisonment / Non – Bailable 

  3. 467 IPC  – Forgery / Punishable upto 10 years or life Imprisonment / Non – Bailable

  4. 468 IPC  – Forgery for the purpose of Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years and fine /  Non Bailable

  5. 471 IPC  – Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record / Punishable upto 7 years of Imprisonment /  Bailable

Our Submissions and Court’s finding in favour of our client / Conclusion  – 

We gave our best while arguing for our client. Later on Hon’ble court considered the aforesaid facts but the applicant is not a Director of the company in which the informant had made Investments; that the applicant is brother of a Director of the Company and the applicant was granted bail in 32 other similar cases. Therefore, the Hon’ble Court granted bail to the applicant.