Skip to content

We represented Mr. Vishnu Gupta in a Bail Matter who was alleged to be Director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies” |8838|

Case Brief

Case Title : Vishnu Gupta vs State of U.P. 

Case No. : 8838/2023 (BAIL)

Decided On / Result : 13.07.2023 

Quorum : Hon’ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

Brief Facts of the Case – 

                In this Matter, FIR No. 496 lodged on 23/08/2020 at Police Station Mawai, District Ayodhya against 15 persons in which the company took the amounts of money from the victim by giving 40% allurement of lucrative return. So, the victim submitted the lump-sum amount of 15,00,00,000 Rs. with their own name, family members and others in the company. The company gave forged bond papers and showed fake documents to gain the trust of them.

Fews facts that went against our client – 

                Some facts were very unfavourable to our client Like –

  1. This matter was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (E.D.) & Economic offences Wing (E.O.W.)

  2. Media & People were claiming that in this matter a Scam of about 1000 Cr. has been done by the said Company.

  3. Applicant was having the Criminal History of 54 Cases.

  4. Applicant was the real brother of Director Ajeet Kumar Gupta who was the director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies”

  5. Gangster Act was also imposed on the applicant.

              

Applicant was Challenged Under Sections – 

  1. 419 IPC – Cheating by personation / Punishable upto 3 years of Imprisonment, fine or both / Bailable

  2. 420 IPC  – Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years of Imprisonment / Non – Bailable 

  3. 467 IPC  – Forgery / Punishable upto 10 years or life Imprisonment / Non – Bailable

  4. 468 IPC  – Forgery for the purpose of Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years and fine /  Non Bailable

Our Submissions and Court’s finding in favour of our client / Conclusion  – 

We gave our best while arguing for our client. Later on Hon’ble court considered the aforesaid facts and there is no specific allegation in the F.I.R against the applicant and that the applicant has already been granted bail in 18 other cases of similar nature. Therefore, the Hon’ble Court granted bail to the applicant.