Skip to content

We represented Mr. Vishnu Gupta in a Bail Matter who was alleged to be Director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies |10904|

Case Brief

Case Title : Vishnu Gupta vs State of U.P. 

Case No. : 10904/2023 (BAIL)

Decided On / Result : 30.08.2023 

Quorum : Hon’ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

Brief Facts of the Case – 

                In this Matter, FIR No. 436 lodged on 20/05/2020 at Police Station Kotwali Rudauli, District Ayodhya against 7 persons in which the company took the amount of Rs. 50,00,000 by the members/agents of the company at victim’s house by showing the forged documents under the allurement of lucrative return. Now, Whenever the victim asks for the money, They switch off their phone and are threatened by their agents to kill them.

Fews facts that went against our client – 

                Some facts were very unfavourable to our client Like –

  1. This matter was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (E.D.) & Economic offences Wing (E.O.W.)

  2. Media & People were claiming that in this matter a Scam of about 1000 Cr. has been done by the said Company.

  3. Applicant was having the Criminal History of 54 Cases.

  4. Applicant was the real brother of Director Ajeet Kumar Gupta who was the director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies”

  5. Gangster Act was also imposed on the applicant.

              

Applicant was Challenged Under Sections – 

  1. 419 IPC – Cheating by personation / Punishable upto 3 years of Imprisonment, fine or both / Bailable

  2. 420 IPC  – Cheating / Punishable upto 7 years of Imprisonment / Non – Bailable 

  3. 506 IPC  – Criminal Intimidation / Imprisonment for 2 years, fine, or both / Non Bailable 

  4. 406 IPC  – Pertaining to criminal breach / Punishable upto 3 years of Imprisonment, fine or both / Non – Bailable

Our Submissions and Court’s finding in favour of our client / Conclusion  – 

We gave our best while arguing for our client. Later on Hon’ble court considered the aforesaid facts but the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case and the applicant is not a Director of the company in which the informant had made investments; that the applicant is brother of a Director of the Company Therefore the Hon’ble Court granted bail to the applicant.

More Case Study

We represented Mr. Vishnu Gupta in a Bail Matter who was alleged to be Director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies”|14085|

We represented Mr. Vishnu Gupta in a Bail Matter who was alleged to be Director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies” |14083|

We represented Mr. Vishnu Gupta in a Bail Matter who was alleged to be Director of “Anee Bullion Group of Companies”|14027|